Design, implement, optimize, and review SIMD code in .NET.
CodeQL for .NET
Use the open-source CodeQL ecosystem for .NET security analysis. Use when a repo needs CodeQL query packs, CLI-based analysis on open source codebases, or GitHub Action setup with explicit licensing caveats. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants CodeQL for .NET security analysis; GitHub code scanning is part of the CI plan. DO NOT USE FOR: teams that need a tool with no private-repo licensing caveat. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
Trigger On
- the repo uses or wants CodeQL for .NET security analysis
- GitHub code scanning is part of the CI plan
Workflow
- Treat CodeQL as a security-analysis tool, not as a style checker.
- Make the licensing and hosting model explicit before proposing it as the default gate.
- Prefer manual build mode for compiled .NET projects when precision matters.
Deliver
- explicit CodeQL setup or an explicit rejection with caveat documented
- reproducible CI or local commands for running CodeQL in this repo
Validate
- the chosen CodeQL path is allowed for the repo type
- build mode is documented and reproducible
Load References
Related skills
Use the open-source free `Asynkron.Profiler` dotnet tool for CLI-first CPU, allocation, exception, contention, and heap profiling of .NET commands or existing trace artifacts.
Asynkron.Profiler
High-performance .NET guidance for writing and tuning C# apps and benchmarks (BenchmarkDotNet, ASP.NET, challenges).
These are the skills our senior team ships with. Want us to build your system? Book a 15-min call.