Generate Testability Wrappers

Workflow

Step 1: Determine the abstraction strategy

Based on the category and target framework:

| Category | .NET 8+ | .NET 6-7 | .NET Framework | |----------|---------|----------|----------------| | Time | TimeProvider (built-in) | TimeProvider via Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider NuGet | Custom ISystemClock | | File system | System.IO.Abstractions (NuGet) | Same | Same | | HTTP | IHttpClientFactory (built-in) | Same | Same | | Environment | Custom IEnvironmentProvider | Same | Same | | Console | Custom IConsole | Same | Same | | Process | Custom IProcessRunner | Same | Same |

The table picks *which abstraction*. How it reaches the code under test is a separate axis:

• instantiable class: constructor injection, even if current callers compose the

object manually;

• existing container: add compile-ready registration following its conventions;
• public static API/signatures that cannot change: Step 5's ambient seam.

Check for a host builder, IServiceCollection, existing registrations, and construction sites. Do not infer "must remain static" merely because the project currently has no container.

Step 2: Generate built-in abstraction adoption (Time, HTTP)

#### TimeProvider (.NET 8+)

No wrapper code needed. Complete all four parts: production registration, constructor injection, a FakeTimeProvider test, and the testing package.

1. Register in DI:

builder.Services.AddSingleton(TimeProvider.System);

1. Inject into classes:

public class OrderProcessor(TimeProvider timeProvider)
{
    public bool IsExpired(Order order)
        => timeProvider.GetUtcNow() > order.ExpiresAt;
}

1. Test with FakeTimeProvider:

// Requires Microsoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing NuGet
var fakeTime = new FakeTimeProvider(new DateTimeOffset(2026, 1, 15, 0, 0, 0, TimeSpan.Zero));
var processor = new OrderProcessor(fakeTime);
fakeTime.Advance(TimeSpan.FromDays(1));
Assert.True(processor.IsExpired(order));

The assertion must prove a time-dependent result after the fake is pinned or advanced. Merely constructing FakeTimeProvider is not a test. When the project has no container but the target is an instantiable class, inject TimeProvider anyway and show explicit production construction with TimeProvider.System; do not replace it with a custom static clock.

Before calling the adoption complete, verify the repository contains or the answer supplies every required artifact: the testing package reference, the production composition/registration, every affected constructor call, and a runnable fake-time test. A code fragment that omits one of those integration points is guidance, not a completed adoption.

#### TimeProvider (pre-.NET 8)

Guide: install Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider NuGet. Same API as above.

#### IHttpClientFactory

No wrapper code needed. Register a typed client via builder.Services.AddHttpClient<MyService>() and inject HttpClient directly into the class constructor. Preserve cancellation by passing the caller's token to the HTTP operation.

For tests, provide a complete fake HttpMessageHandler whose SendAsync returns a deterministic HttpResponseMessage, construct HttpClient with that handler, and exercise the typed client without network access. Compile and run the focused test when the task asks for implementation; do not stop at a schematic handler method.

When production uses a typed-client registration, test that same registration pipeline: configure its primary handler in ServiceCollection, resolve the typed client, and call it. A test that manually constructs HttpClient proves the class but not the DI registration the task asked to adopt.

Step 3: Generate custom wrappers (Environment, Console, Process)

For categories without built-in abstractions, follow this template:

#### Interface — define the minimal surface

Only include methods that were actually detected in the codebase. Do NOT generate a wrapper for every possible member — wrap only what is used.

Prefer a stateless operation-shaped interface. For example, if a caller only needs to start a process, wait, and return its exit code, expose one Run operation rather than a stateful wrapper that leaks Process lifecycle.

namespace <Namespace>;

/// <summary>
/// Abstraction over <static class> for testability.
/// </summary>
public interface I<WrapperName>
{
    // One method per detected static call
    <return type> <MethodName>(<parameters>);
}

#### Default implementation — delegate to the real static

namespace <Namespace>;

/// <summary>
/// Default implementation that delegates to <static class>.
/// </summary>
public sealed class <WrapperName> : I<WrapperName>
{
    public <return type> <MethodName>(<parameters>)
        => <StaticClass>.<Method>(<arguments>);
}

#### DI registration

// In Program.cs or Startup.cs:
builder.Services.AddSingleton<I<WrapperName>, <WrapperName>>();

Treat registration as a deliverable, not a sentence in the summary. Add it to the repository's existing registration surface when one exists. Otherwise show the exact compile-ready statement and identify where the caller should place it. Stateless delegating wrappers are singleton; if state must be retained, explain why a shorter lifetime is required.

Step 4: Generate file system wrapper adoption

Prefer the established System.IO.Abstractions NuGet package over custom wrappers:

1. Install the package:

dotnet add package System.IO.Abstractions

1. Register in DI:

builder.Services.AddSingleton<IFileSystem, FileSystem>();

1. Inject IFileSystem into classes:

public class ConfigLoader(IFileSystem fileSystem)
{
    public string LoadConfig(string path)
        => fileSystem.File.ReadAllText(path);
}

1. Test with MockFileSystem:

dotnet add <TestProject> package System.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers

var mockFs = new MockFileSystem(new Dictionary<string, MockFileData>
{
    { "/config.json", new MockFileData("{\"key\": \"value\"}") }
});
var loader = new ConfigLoader(mockFs);
Assert.Equal("{\"key\": \"value\"}", loader.LoadConfig("/config.json"));

Package-first adoption is exclusive: add both package references, use IFileSystem in production, register or explicitly compose FileSystem, and seed MockFileSystem before exercising the consumer. Do not also generate a second custom filesystem interface, and do not present an unseeded mock whose test could pass without proving the requested read/write behavior.

Step 5: Generate a signature-preserving ambient context

Use this pattern when the API must remain static or its released signatures cannot accept a dependency:

public static class Clock
{
    private static readonly AsyncLocal<Func<DateTime>?> s_override = new();
    public static DateTime UtcNow
        => s_override.Value?.Invoke() ?? TimeProvider.System.GetUtcNow().UtcDateTime;

    internal static IDisposable Override(DateTime fixedUtcTime)
    {
        if (fixedUtcTime.Kind != DateTimeKind.Utc)
            throw new ArgumentException("The override must be UTC.", nameof(fixedUtcTime));

        var previous = s_override.Value;
        s_override.Value = () => fixedUtcTime;
        return new Scope(previous);
    }
    private sealed class Scope : IDisposable
    {
        private readonly Func<DateTime>? _previous;
        private bool _disposed;

        public Scope(Func<DateTime>? previous)
        {
            _previous = previous;
        }

        public void Dispose()
        {
            if (_disposed)
                return;

            s_override.Value = _previous;
            _disposed = true;
        }
    }
}

Key trade-offs: AsyncLocal<T> ensures parallel tests don't interfere; production cost is one null check per call; the static readonly field is essentially free.

Three properties this pattern must keep, because each has broken a real migration:

• Scope the override and make it reversible. Return an IDisposable that restores the previous value, so a test cannot leak a pinned time into the next one. A bare setter, or a manual try/finally at each call site, puts that burden on every test author.
• Use `AsyncLocal<T>`, never `[ThreadStatic]`. [ThreadStatic] does not flow across await, so the override silently disappears mid-test.
• Preserve the semantics of the member you are replacing. Substituting DateTime.UtcNow with a local-time source changes the DateTimeKind every existing caller and stored value depends on — pair UtcNow with GetUtcNow(), and Now with GetLocalNow().
• Prove the test assembly can reach the override. An internal override is

inaccessible from a separate test assembly unless the production project adds the exact InternalsVisibleTo for that test assembly. Otherwise use an already-public seam only when a public API change is authorized. Never show a test calling an inaccessible member.

The same shape works for non-time statics: swap TimeProvider.System.GetUtcNow() for the real static call and keep the override slot, the disposable scope, and the original semantics.

Step 6: Place generated files

Generate files following the project's existing conventions:

• If there is an Abstractions/ or Interfaces/ folder, place the interface there
• If there is an Infrastructure/ or Services/ folder, place the implementation there
• Otherwise, create files next to the code that uses the static

Always generate:

1. The interface file (or adoption instructions for built-in abstractions)
2. The default implementation file
3. The compile-ready DI registration, applied to an existing registration

surface or shown at the exact composition point.

1. A deterministic substitution example or focused test that exercises the

consumer without the ambient resource.

Skip registration entirely on the ambient-seam path: there is no container to register into, and offering one anyway is the failure mode that made a user ask for the seam in the first place.

Before reporting completion, verify the delivered output contains every item the prompt requested. In particular, do not summarize "singleton registration" when no registration code was added or shown, and do not claim testability without demonstrating how the consumer receives a fake. For console wrappers, exercise the consumer with a fake that both captures the prompt and supplies the returned input; a build or banner-only run does not prove the prompt flow.

Related skills