Review .NET changes for bugs, regressions, architectural drift, missing tests, incorrect async or disposal behavior, and platform-specific pitfalls before you approve or merge…
MCAF: Human Review Planning
Apply MCAF human-review-planning guidance for a large AI-generated code drop by reading the target area, tracing the natural user and system flows, identifying the riskiest boundaries, and prioritizing the files a human should inspect first. Use when the codebase is too large to review line-by-line and you need a practical review sequence plus a prioritized file list.
Trigger On
- a large AI-generated code drop needs a human review plan
- the reviewer cannot inspect every line and needs prioritization
- the user asks which files are highest risk before doing manual review
- the user names a generated folder and wants a saved review plan for it
Workflow
- Read enough of the target area and its immediate boundaries to understand the generated code before planning review.
- Map the natural flow of operations first:
- sign up or authentication - create - update - register or configure - execute primary business action - complete, archive, or finalize
- Use that flow to derive the most efficient human review sequence.
- Use the reviewer's domain knowledge as a force multiplier:
- compare the generated code against known architecture and existing entities - look for places where the new feature should behave like nearby existing flows - prioritize boundaries where generated code may drift from established system rules
- Identify high-risk review zones:
- entry points and orchestration layers - persistence and state transitions - cross-boundary integrations - permissions, validation, and invariants - side effects such as email, payments, jobs, or notifications
- Produce two separate outputs:
- prioritized review flow - prioritized files or modules to inspect
- Present both outputs in chat.
- If the user asks for a durable artifact, save the plan to the exact docs path they requested; otherwise use
docs/AREA/HUMAN_REVIEW_PLAN.md.
Deliver
- a prioritized human review sequence
- a prioritized list of files or modules to inspect first
- both sections presented separately in chat
- a saved
HUMAN_REVIEW_PLAN.mdwhen requested
Validate
- the plan is grounded in actual code reading, not only the folder names
- the review order follows actual user or system flows
- high-risk files are explained, not only listed
- priorities account for likely mismatch against existing architecture or analogous entities
- the plan helps a human skip low-value line-by-line review
- the saved plan is readable without extra chat context
Load References
- read
references/review-plan-format.mdfor the output shape - read
references/risk-signals.mdwhen deciding what deserves human attention first
Related skills
Adopt MCAF governance in a .NET repository with the right AGENTS.md layout, repo-native docs, skill installation, verification rules, and non-trivial task workflow.
Apply MCAF agile-delivery guidance for backlog quality, roles, ceremonies, and engineering feedback.